"Yellow House" is a
Russian colloquialism that means "insane asylum."
The principal screening venue for Russian film is Moscow's famous
House
of Cinema. The topic for the 2005
Russian Film Symposium is The Yellow House of Cinema.
The Yellow House of Cinema
examines the themes, visual practices, and cultural politics in recent Russian
cinema around issues of social psychosis, dementia, mania, folly, lunacy,
aberration, and the absurd. This
theme is a productive one for the present moment, and offers some striking
insights into Russia's social identity over the centuries.
Russia—the pre-1917 Russian Empire, the Soviet Empire, or the Russian
Federation—has never had a coherent or consistent "national
identity." Instead, from the
Muscovite state of the mid-16th century through the present, Russia
has borne an imperial identity, marked by the presence of a strong center that
subsumed discrete ethnic identities—Ukrainian or Belorussian, Georgian or
Armenian, Kazakh or Uzbek—as territories at its (often underdeveloped and
occupied) periphery, where identity was never separated from
"otherness." This dilemma
was brought to resolution neither with the Soviet Union's loss of its East
European satellite states nor with its fragmentation in 1991 into fifteen Newly
Independent States (NIS). The
history of the Russian Federation since 1991 continues to be marked by further
internal fragmentation, discrete independence movements that have gripped
outlying regions of the state. The
war in Chechnya is merely the most familiar example; less violent attempts at
secession continue in Dagestan, Ingushetia, Tartarstan, Yakutia, and other
regions.
Russia's identity crisis, then, is
a dual one. On the one hand, it is
marked by the state's continued adherence to an imperial mentality predicated on
the total exercise of economic and legislative control from the (imperial)
political center, marked in recent months by the re-appropriation of the state's
control over natural resource and technology industries, as well as the
elimination of regional and gubernatorial elections and the on-going conflict in
Chechnya. On the other hand, this
search is marked by a dislocation within social consciousness concerning the
very definition of a "Russian-ness" irreducible (yet again) to a set
of negatives: "not" European, "not" Asian, "not"
Caucasian, "not" New Russians, "not" Jewish, etc.
The conflict between the two parts of this identity search have been
recurrently represented in contemporary Russian culture as a kind of disorder
within the social body of the Russian state, a disorder assigned for cinematic
treatment in The Yellow House, the [in]sane asylum, a place of both refuge and
detention.
In the films to be screened during this year's Symposium, the
"Yellow House" sometimes appears as a locus,
a demarcated space of disorder and treatment, confinement and refuge.
More frequently, however, it appears as a causus,
a personal state of mind, a social condition of being, or a political horizon of
imposed limitations. The
"Yellow House" can be spatialized explicitly or implicitly: Iurii
Grymov's The Mastermind (2001) and Andrei Konchalovskii's House
of Fools (2002) contrast with the implied aberration in Anna Melikian's Mars
(2004) and Andrei Nekrasov's documentary Disbelief (2004).
The "Yellow House" can be articulated historically, as in Pavel
Chukhrai's A Driver for Vera (2004), Dmitrii Meskhiev's Our Own
(2004), and Aleksandr Veledinskii's Russian (2004); or allegorically, as in
Vadim Abdrashitov's Magnetic Storms (2003) and Il'ia Khrzhanovskii's
still to be released 4 (2004). Not
even intimate relations and domestic environments are safe from the aura of the
"Yellow House": gender (Ol'ga Stolpovskaia and Dmitrii Troitskii's You
I Love [2004]); courtship (Kira Muratova's The Tuner [2004]); and
family (Valerii Todorovskii's My Stepbrother Frankenstein [2004]) merely constitute other
arenas for enacting the collective dislocation of inherited (and suspect) ideas
concerning issues of identity and allegiance.
What these instances share is the "Yellow
House" as a sign of ontological and existential disruption within both the
individual and the collective psyche. And,
paradoxically, it is testimony to the health of the Russian cinema industry
that, having recovered from the financial and artistic ills of the 1990s, it
addresses this topic with an imaginative force unparalleled since the fall of
communism.